Author : Sharon Powell
We recently purchased a 10.2 megapixel digital SLR and are trying to figure out the best way to store out images. Since my Storybook software does not support the raw files I am saving them as JPGs, but the man at the store said to save them as a type of file that is huge. We take hundreds of photos in an outing so this is really space prohibitive. I read that JPG keeps averaging pixels each time you open it to make a change so I am afraid that is not the best way either. I have noticed that when I save the changes, it is fewer pixels. I want the best quality, but within reason. I like to use full size pictures as backgrounds sometimes and I also want to be able to crop a small section of the picture to use for a close up. What do you suggest?
Storing images as raw files does require significantly more space than storing JPG files. Raw files also require more image editing to produce prints and other photo products. Finally, camera manufacturers have not standardized the raw file format, which leads to long-term preservation concerns.
Personally, I do not shoot raw files. For the reasons I indicated above, I find it easier and more convenient to shoot JPG files; however, when I edit my image files I store the edited version as a LZW compressed TIF file, being careful not to overwrite the original file. This avoids the successive image compresion issue you mentioned and always allows me to go back to the original file, if needed. Like you, I am considering using raw files and I will let you know if I make the change.
If you do choose to shoot raw files, I recommend converting these files to the digital negative format (DNG) using Photoshop or another imaging program that handles conversions. Converting your raw files to DNG format will increase the chances that they will remain accessible in the future.