An interesting question has come up in conjunction with the ISO’s effort to define the vocabulary associated with image permanence and that is what is a digital print. The definition I would suggest is any print that originated from an image captured with a digital camera or scanner. Of course, this definition means that traditional photographic prints produced from digital images are digital prints while the same prints produced from a photographic negative are not. The reason for this distinction is that I suspect most consumers think in terms of image capture, not the output technology. Any thoughts? Agree or disagree?
DisclaimerAll opinions on this blog are mine, not HID Global's.
Join 666 other followers
Recent Posts: Science About Politics